Thiazide diuretics alone or combined with potassium-sparing diuretics to treat hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects and decrease of the adverse effects of thiazide diuretics provided by potassium-sparing diuretics remain uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the BP-lowering efficacy and the incidence of adverse effects of high (T+) and low-dose (T-) thiazide diuretics, alone or combined with high (PS+) or low-dose (PS-) potassium-sparing diuretics in patients with primary hypertension. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS. Randomized double-blind placebo or active-controlled trials (RCT) with 3 weeks to 1 year of follow-up were included. Sample size, mean and standard deviation from baseline, follow-up and change from baseline values were extracted by two independent reviewers. Pairwise random effect models and Bayesian network meta-analysis models were used to compare the effects of treatments. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Rob 1.0 tool. The primary outcome was the mean difference in office SBP. Secondary outcomes were the mean difference in biochemical parameters and the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-six double-blind RCTs involving 58 807 participants (mean age: 55 years; 45% women) were included. All treatment groups were more effective than placebo in lowering BP, with mean differences (MDs) of change from baseline ranging from -7.66 mmHg [95% credible interval (95% CrI), -8.53 to -6.79] for T- to -12.77 mmHg (95% CrI, -15.22 to -10.31) for T+PS-. T+ alone or combined with potassium-sparing was more effective in reducing BP than T-. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) estimated ranking showed that the best effectiveness in lowering SBP was found for T+PS- (0.69), T+PS+ (0.65) and T+ (0.54). Compared with placebo, all treatments (except T-PS-) were associated with more potassium reduction and T+ compared with all other treatments and T- when compared with T-PS-. Compared with placebo, all active treatments (except T+PS+) showed higher elevations of uric acid. The increase of plasma glucose promoted by thiazides alone was reduced by potassium-sparing agents. CONCLUSION: Thiazides with potassium-sparing diuretics are associated with increased BP-lowering efficacy compared with thiazides alone while minimizing hypokalaemia and hyperglycaemia. These findings demonstrate that thiazide and potassium-sparing diuretic combination is preferable to thiazide alone in treating hypertension.

Optimization of Care for Adult Outpatients With Type 2 Diabetes Through the Diabetes Self-Management Multidisciplinary Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a Self-Management Multidisciplinary Program (MP) on glycemic management, quality of life and diabetes self-care activities. METHODS: People with type 2 diabetes and glycated hemoglobin (A1C) of >7.5% were randomized to participate in the MP or to usual care (UC). The MP consisted of face-to-face meetings with each health-care provider (nurse, pharmacist, dietitian, physical educator and social worker) to approach diabetes self-management issues. MP topics were tailored toward local habits and culture. Three different modules were offered over 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in A1C from baseline to 12 months. Diabetes Quality of Life and Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities questionnaires were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Ninety-six participants were included (mean 59 years of age, 60% women, diabetes duration 16±10 years, 62% of lower middle/low socioeconomic status). Change in A1C at 12 months (UC: 0.52% [95% confidence interval, -1.07 to 0.04]; MP: -0.30% [95% confidence interval, -1.05 to 0.44]; p=0.33) was not different between the groups. There was an increase in satisfaction and a reduction in worry about future effects of diabetes in the MP group, which was not found in the UC group. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term self-management multidisciplinary program improved diabetes-related quality of life but failed to reduce A1C in individuals with longstanding type 2 diabetes and a low socioeconomic status.